PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

ZYAU.AX (Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF) and ACDC.AX (Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZYAU.AX is a Dividend fund tracking the Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend Index, while ACDC.AX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZYAU.AX returned 7.88%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for ACDC.AX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF (ZYAU.AX) and Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZYAU.AX achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than ACDC.AX's 5.57% return.

ZYAU.AX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-1.11%
6M
7.39%
YTD
7.50%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
8.55%

ACDC.AX

1D
-0.70%
1M
-13.60%
6M
-5.45%
YTD
5.57%
1Y
56.36%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZYAU.AX
Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF		7.50%16.65%9.61%13.28%-10.97%18.29%-11.11%18.18%-6.82%
ACDC.AX
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF		5.57%59.62%7.63%7.32%-8.33%20.60%63.17%18.91%-10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ZYAU.AX and ACDC.AX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.51

The correlation between ZYAU.AX and ACDC.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF

Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF

Return for Risk

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZYAU.AX
ZYAU.AX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ZYAU.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZYAU.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZYAU.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ZYAU.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZYAU.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
ACDC.AX
ACDC.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACDC.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACDC.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACDC.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ACDC.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACDC.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF (ZYAU.AX) and Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZYAU.AXACDC.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
1.87

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.14
2.47

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.68

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

8.82

-1.71

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZYAU.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the ACDC.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZYAU.AX and ACDC.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZYAU.AX drawdown since its inception was -41.40%, which is greater than ACDC.AX's maximum drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZYAU.AX and ACDC.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZYAU.AXACDC.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.40%

-27.23%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-20.29%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.67%

-26.50%

+14.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-27.07%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-19.68%

+17.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-8.15%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

6.25%

-3.84%

Volatility

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF (ZYAU.AX) is 1.94%, while Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC.AX) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that ZYAU.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACDC.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZYAU.AXACDC.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

7.06%

-5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

23.28%

-14.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

29.13%

-17.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

21.97%

-8.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

21.12%

-5.80%

Dividends

ZYAU.AX vs. ACDC.AX - Dividend Comparison

ZYAU.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than ACDC.AX's 12.39% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACDC.AX
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF		12.39%0.91%6.82%3.96%0.89%6.76%0.95%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZYAU.AX
Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF		4.28%4.22%7.82%11.01%9.36%6.73%4.68%6.38%9.89%15.54%5.13%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZYAU.AX and ACDC.AX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZYAU.AX is categorized as Dividend, while ACDC.AX is Alternative Energy Equities. ZYAU.AX tracks Global X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend Index, while ACDC.AX tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZYAU.AX and ACDC.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer