PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZXM.TO (CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged) and CCCX.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZXM.TO is a Momentum fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Momentum Index, while CCCX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management. ZXM.TO is passively managed, while CCCX.TO is actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZXM.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX.TO.

Performance

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZXM.TO achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX.TO's -26.82% return.

ZXM.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.88%
YTD
12.33%
6M
14.29%
1Y
33.18%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
13.06%

CCCX.TO

1D
-2.21%
1M
-11.33%
YTD
-26.82%
6M
-28.69%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ZXM.TO
CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged		12.33%9.17%
CCCX.TO
CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF		-26.82%-25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ZXM.TO and CCCX.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF

Often compared with ZXM.TO:
ZXM.TO vs. VXM.TOZXM.TO vs. XDSR.TOZXM.TO vs. WXM.TOZXM.TO vs. CCOM.TOZXM.TO vs. QDX.TOZXM.TO vs. FCIL.NEOZXM.TO vs. FCIM.NEO
Often compared with CCCX.TO:
CCCX.TO vs. ETHACCCX.TO vs. IBITCCCX.TO vs. ETHX.TOCCCX.TO vs. ETHY.TOCCCX.TO vs. BTCC-U.TOCCCX.TO vs. CGHY.TOCCCX.TO vs. FBTC.TO

Return for Risk

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZXM.TO
ZXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ZXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
CCCX.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged (ZXM.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZXM.TOCCCX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.28

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.26

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.91

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZXM.TOCCCX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

-1.04

+1.78

Drawdowns

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZXM.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.22%, smaller than the maximum CCCX.TO drawdown of -54.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZXM.TO and CCCX.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZXM.TOCCCX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.22%

-54.70%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.74%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.22%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-50.00%

+47.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-32.62%

+26.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

—

—

Volatility

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZXM.TOCCCX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

53.31%

-38.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

53.31%

-37.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

53.31%

-36.61%

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZXM.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZXM.TO vs. CCCX.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZXM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, while CCCX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCCX.TO
CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZXM.TO
CI Morningstar International Momentum Index ETF Common Units CAD Hedged		2.25%2.39%2.97%3.57%5.50%1.58%0.86%1.19%1.49%0.89%1.19%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZXM.TO and CCCX.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCCX.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCCX.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for ZXM.TO.

ZXM.TO is categorized as Momentum, while CCCX.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for ZXM.TO and 0.50% for CCCX.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZXM.TO and CCCX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer