ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZWK.TO (BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF) and ZWH.TO (BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWK.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while ZWH.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZWK.TO returned 5.14%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for ZWH.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWK.TO achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than ZWH.TO's 13.86% return.

ZWK.TO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 29.64%
• 3Y*: 25.07%
• 5Y*: 5.14%
• 10Y*: —

ZWH.TO

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 14.93%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZWK.TO BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF	3.97%	16.61%	40.99%	-15.25%	-17.50%	37.38%	-14.63%	13.05%
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF	13.86%	6.40%	19.30%	5.04%	-0.57%	24.20%	0.19%	11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019	0.66

The correlation between ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZWK.TO	ZWH.TO
Financial Services	100.0%	12.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	9.4%
Energy	-	9.0%
Healthcare	-	12.6%
Industrials	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	4.2%
Technology	-	28.4%
Utilities	-	6.5%

Return for Risk

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWK.TO

ZWK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ZWK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ZWK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ZWK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ZWK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ZWH.TO

ZWH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
ZWH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ZWH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ZWH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ZWH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ZWH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZWK.TO	ZWH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	2.77	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	4.08	-1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.51	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	4.81	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.05	18.98	-12.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the ZWH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZWK.TO	ZWH.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	2.77	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.99	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.80	-0.57

Drawdowns

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than ZWH.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZWK.TO	ZWH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.02%	-34.01%	-14.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.73%	-5.69%	-10.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.84%	-15.59%	-10.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.02%	-15.59%	-32.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	0.00%	-3.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.46%	-3.11%	-13.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	1.44%	+3.47%

Volatility

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH.TO) at 3.46%. This indicates that ZWK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZWK.TO	ZWH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	3.46%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.21%	7.66%	+6.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	9.91%	+9.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	11.65%	+12.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.53%	14.84%	+13.69%

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

ZWK.TO vs. ZWH.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than ZWH.TO's 5.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZWH.TO BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF	5.76%	6.22%	4.87%	5.71%	6.03%	5.64%	6.59%	5.97%	5.66%	5.46%	5.57%	5.31%
ZWK.TO BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF	6.41%	6.49%	7.05%	10.38%	8.21%	6.54%	8.46%	5.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO in my portfolio?

ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZWK.TO or ZWH.TO?

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZWK.TO or ZWH.TO?

ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

What is the main difference between ZWK.TO and ZWH.TO?

ZWK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZWH.TO is Derivative Income.