PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWK.TO achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly higher than CALL.TO's 1.20% return.


ZWK.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.85%
YTD
3.97%
6M
5.81%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
25.07%
5Y*
5.14%
10Y*

CALL.TO

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
1.20%
6M
5.50%
1Y
23.36%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
3.97%16.61%40.99%-15.25%-17.50%37.38%-14.63%13.05%
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units
1.20%17.96%30.56%-10.46%-21.68%35.56%-12.36%16.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWK.TO and CALL.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.78

The correlation between ZWK.TO and CALL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZWK.TO
CALL.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

ZWK.TO
100.0%
CALL.TO
100.0%

Basic Materials

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Communication Services

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Energy

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Healthcare

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Industrials

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Real Estate

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Technology

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Utilities

ZWK.TO

-

CALL.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWK.TO
ZWK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CALL.TO
CALL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CALL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWK.TOCALL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.47

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

4.12

+1.93

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the CALL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWK.TO and CALL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWK.TOCALL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.16

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.08

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.16

+0.07

Drawdowns

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, smaller than the maximum CALL.TO drawdown of -52.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWK.TO and CALL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWK.TOCALL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-52.03%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-15.97%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.84%

-26.25%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.02%

-52.03%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-7.39%

+3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.46%

-18.35%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

5.69%

-0.78%

Volatility

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) is 5.04%, while Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units (CALL.TO) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that ZWK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWK.TOCALL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.57%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

14.88%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

20.27%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

27.30%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.53%

29.06%

-0.53%

Dividends

ZWK.TO vs. CALL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, less than CALL.TO's 11.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CALL.TO
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield Fund Hedged Units
11.04%10.68%11.24%13.02%10.20%6.87%8.49%7.32%11.55%
ZWK.TO
BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF
6.41%6.49%7.05%10.38%8.21%6.54%8.46%5.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ZWK.TO and CALL.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWK.TO and CALL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer