ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO
ZWK.TO (BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWK.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. ZWK.TO is actively managed, while CFOU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZWK.TO returned 5.14%/yr vs 28.45%/yr for CFOU.TO. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZWK.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.
Performance
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWK.TO achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.
ZWK.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CFOU.TO
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 9.71%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 6M
- 34.47%
- 1Y
- 88.95%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 28.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWK.TO BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF | 3.97% | 16.61% | 40.99% | -15.25% | -17.50% | 37.38% | -14.63% | 13.05% |
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 23.22% | 69.17% | 56.15% | 18.37% | -23.64% | 79.61% | -14.70% | 15.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWK.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between ZWK.TO and CFOU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWK.TO
CFOU.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ZWK.TO
CFOU.TO
Basic Materials
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Communication Services
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Energy
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Healthcare
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Industrials
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Real Estate
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Technology
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Utilities
ZWK.TO
-
CFOU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWK.TO
CFOU.TO
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.57 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 5.56 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 22.74 | -16.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 3.62 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 1.04 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.33 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWK.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWK.TO and CFOU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.02% | -86.23% | +38.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.73% | -16.08% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.84% | -24.95% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.02% | -45.23% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -3.23% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -22.46% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 3.93% | +0.98% |
Volatility
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF (ZWK.TO) is 5.04%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that ZWK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWK.TO | CFOU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 8.18% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 20.93% | -6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 24.70% | -5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 27.56% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 33.85% | -5.32% |
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWK.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWK.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWK.TO BMO Covered Call US Banks ETF | 6.41% | 6.49% | 7.05% | 10.38% | 8.21% | 6.54% | 8.46% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWK.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZWK.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZWK.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
ZWK.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWK.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWK.TO and CFOU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer