PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWG.TO achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than VDY.TO's 20.59% return.


ZWG.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
7.53%
YTD
11.46%
6M
8.19%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*

VDY.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.52%
YTD
20.59%
6M
22.32%
1Y
46.18%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZWG.TO
BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF
11.46%7.31%21.47%9.25%-4.38%17.19%614.61%
VDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF
20.59%29.20%20.71%8.40%-0.23%36.78%-4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWG.TO and VDY.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.54

The correlation between ZWG.TO and VDY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZWG.TO
VDY.TO

Technology

25.3%
0.4%

Financial Services

20.9%
56.0%

Healthcare

11.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
0.4%

Energy

8.9%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

6.2%
2.8%

Industrials

5.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

4.1%

Technology

ZWG.TO
25.3%
VDY.TO
0.4%

Financial Services

ZWG.TO
20.9%
VDY.TO
56.0%

Healthcare

ZWG.TO
11.2%
VDY.TO
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

ZWG.TO
9.1%
VDY.TO
0.4%

Energy

ZWG.TO
8.9%
VDY.TO
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZWG.TO
8.6%
VDY.TO
3.0%

Communication Services

ZWG.TO
6.2%
VDY.TO
2.8%

Industrials

ZWG.TO
5.2%
VDY.TO
0.2%

Basic Materials

ZWG.TO
4.5%
VDY.TO
2.2%

Real Estate

ZWG.TO

-

VDY.TO

-

Utilities

ZWG.TO

-

VDY.TO
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWG.TO
ZWG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ZWG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VDY.TO
VDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWG.TOVDY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.14

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

14.88

-11.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

60.75

-48.06

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the VDY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWG.TO and VDY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWG.TOVDY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

5.65

-3.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.50

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.84

-0.64

Drawdowns

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWG.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, smaller than the maximum VDY.TO drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWG.TO and VDY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWG.TOVDY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-39.21%

+13.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.88%

-3.12%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.87%

-10.87%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.62%

-16.18%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.77%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-4.61%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.76%

+1.03%

Volatility

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VDY.TO) at 3.31%. This indicates that ZWG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWG.TOVDY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.31%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

6.87%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

8.21%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.71%

11.56%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

239.97%

15.96%

+224.01%

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWG.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VDY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZWG.TO vs. VDY.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than VDY.TO's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDY.TO
Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF
2.90%3.59%4.40%4.64%4.42%3.58%4.59%4.25%4.43%3.82%3.25%4.11%
ZWG.TO
BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF
5.88%6.41%6.48%7.42%7.23%6.40%6.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWG.TO and VDY.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDY.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWG.TO.

ZWG.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while VDY.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWG.TO and 0.22% for VDY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWG.TO and VDY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer