ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZWG.TO (BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZWG.TO returned 16.14%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for DXQ.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZWG.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for DXQ.TO.

Performance

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWG.TO achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than DXQ.TO's 6.80% return.

ZWG.TO

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 7.53%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 6M: 8.19%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: —

DXQ.TO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 17.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZWG.TO BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF	11.46%	7.31%	21.47%	9.25%	8.51%
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF	6.80%	12.99%	21.07%	20.08%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2022	0.49

The correlation between ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWG.TO

ZWG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
ZWG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ZWG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ZWG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ZWG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ZWG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DXQ.TO

DXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
DXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) and Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZWG.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.08	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.95	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	3.74	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.68	10.46	+2.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the DXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZWG.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	2.08	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	1.61	-1.41

Drawdowns

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWG.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.55%, which is greater than DXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZWG.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.55%	-15.54%	-10.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.88%	-5.11%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.87%	-15.54%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.70%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-1.27%	-2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.82%	-0.03%

Volatility

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWG.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) at 2.38%. This indicates that ZWG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZWG.TO	DXQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	2.38%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	7.14%	+1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	9.21%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.71%	10.92%	+0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	239.97%	10.92%	+229.05%

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWG.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQ.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZWG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than DXQ.TO's 7.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF	7.77%	7.45%	5.74%	6.54%	1.83%	0.00%	0.00%
ZWG.TO BMO Global High Dividend Covered Call ETF	5.88%	6.41%	6.48%	7.42%	7.23%	6.40%	6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO in my portfolio?

ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZWG.TO or DXQ.TO?

On fees, ZWG.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZWG.TO or DXQ.TO?

ZWG.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for DXQ.TO.

What is the main difference between ZWG.TO and DXQ.TO?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Dynamic. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWG.TO and 0.72% for DXQ.TO.