ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO
ZWC.TO (BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF) and RATE.TO (Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO, while RATE.TO is a fund fund. Over the past 5 years, ZWC.TO returned 11.09%/yr vs 6.03%/yr for RATE.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWC.TO achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly higher than RATE.TO's 1.10% return.
ZWC.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- —
RATE.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZWC.TO BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 11.12% | 22.79% | 12.00% | 7.54% | -3.54% | 25.39% | -6.92% | 17.32% | -10.05% | 0.78% |
RATE.TO Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund | 1.10% | 4.60% | 7.87% | 13.19% | 3.24% | 2.46% | 3.49% | 6.56% | -0.84% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWC.TO and RATE.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2017 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWC.TO
RATE.TO
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) and Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWC.TO | RATE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.31 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 4.57 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.23 | 15.31 | +7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWC.TO | RATE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | 1.62 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.84 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWC.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.57%, which is greater than RATE.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWC.TO and RATE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWC.TO | RATE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.57% | -14.01% | -26.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -0.80% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.09% | -1.70% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.43% | -3.38% | -13.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -0.07% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -0.80% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 0.24% | +0.97% |
Volatility
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund (RATE.TO) at 0.74%. This indicates that ZWC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RATE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWC.TO | RATE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 0.74% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 1.85% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 2.26% | +5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 4.03% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 5.75% | +9.19% |
Dividends
ZWC.TO vs. RATE.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than RATE.TO's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RATE.TO Arrow EC Income Advantage Alternative Fund | 4.64% | 4.60% | 5.68% | 7.43% | 4.97% | 3.52% | 2.98% | 2.99% | 2.32% | 0.00% |
ZWC.TO BMO CA High Dividend Covered Call ETF | 5.64% | 5.92% | 6.73% | 7.62% | 7.01% | 6.60% | 8.15% | 6.92% | 7.11% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWC.TO and RATE.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZWC.TO and RATE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer