PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWB.TO achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly higher than ZWE.TO's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWB.TO has outperformed ZWE.TO with an annualized return of 12.24%, while ZWE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.


ZWB.TO

1D
-0.31%
1M
5.06%
YTD
16.23%
6M
21.03%
1Y
49.97%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
12.24%

ZWE.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
3.89%
6M
5.73%
1Y
12.64%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
16.23%34.91%19.41%6.67%-11.00%30.81%1.68%14.32%-8.08%11.52%
ZWE.TO
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF
3.89%14.25%7.16%14.84%0.29%19.26%-8.67%22.06%-10.78%11.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWB.TO and ZWE.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2015

0.52

The correlation between ZWB.TO and ZWE.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZWB.TO
ZWE.TO

Financial Services

100.0%
22.4%

Basic Materials

-

8.5%

Communication Services

-

5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.8%

Energy

-

10.3%

Healthcare

-

10.8%

Industrials

-

10.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

6.2%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Financial Services

ZWB.TO
100.0%
ZWE.TO
22.4%

Basic Materials

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
8.5%

Communication Services

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
8.8%

Energy

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
10.3%

Healthcare

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
10.8%

Industrials

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
10.6%

Real Estate

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO

-

Technology

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
6.2%

Utilities

ZWB.TO

-

ZWE.TO
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZWB.TO
ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWE.TO
ZWE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ZWE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWB.TOZWE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.21

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

1.33

+5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.83

4.81

+24.01

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.44, which is higher than the ZWE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWB.TO and ZWE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZWB.TOZWE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44

1.15

+3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.73

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.54

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.49

+0.25

Drawdowns

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, which is greater than ZWE.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWB.TO and ZWE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZWB.TOZWE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.36%

-35.38%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-9.56%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-13.60%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-13.60%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.36%

-35.38%

-3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.97%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-4.14%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.63%

-0.89%

Volatility

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWE.TO) at 2.98%. This indicates that ZWB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZWB.TOZWE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

2.98%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

8.72%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

11.00%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

12.55%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

15.40%

+0.28%

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWB.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWE.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZWB.TO vs. ZWE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than ZWE.TO's 6.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
5.02%5.38%6.66%7.62%7.30%5.46%5.80%5.53%5.59%4.80%5.04%5.64%
ZWE.TO
BMO Europe High Dividend Covered Call Hedged to CAD ETF
6.74%6.81%7.25%7.25%6.98%6.30%7.74%6.53%7.59%6.49%6.76%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZWB.TO and ZWE.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZWE.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZWE.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for ZWB.TO.

ZWB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZWE.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for ZWB.TO and 0.65% for ZWE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWB.TO and ZWE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer