ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
ZWA.TO (BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZWA.TO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average, while JEPQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. ZWA.TO is passively managed, while JEPQ.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, ZWA.TO returned 16.51% vs 28.24% for JEPQ.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZWA.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZWA.TO achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.TO's 7.80% return.
ZWA.TO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZWA.TO BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF | 3.75% | 10.55% | 1.26% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 7.80% | 10.46% | 13.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZWA.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ZWA.TO and JEPQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Industrials
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Technology
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Healthcare
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Energy
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Communication Services
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
Real Estate
ZWA.TO
-
JEPQ.TO
Utilities
ZWA.TO
-
JEPQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWA.TO
JEPQ.TO
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWA.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.67 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | 14.57 | -7.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWA.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.19 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.13 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZWA.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWA.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWA.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -20.05% | -18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -7.74% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -3.34% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -3.36% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.94% | +0.57% |
Volatility
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA.TO) is 2.89%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that ZWA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWA.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 5.18% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 10.33% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 12.94% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 17.35% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 17.35% | -0.34% |
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWA.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWA.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than JEPQ.TO's 10.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.30% | 10.34% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWA.TO BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF | 5.65% | 5.65% | 5.89% | 6.21% | 6.02% | 4.36% | 5.04% | 4.46% | 4.74% | 4.15% | 4.83% | 4.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZWA.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWA.TO.
ZWA.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: BMO Asset Management and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWA.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWA.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer