PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ZWA.TO (BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF) and BANK.TO (Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both Derivative Income funds - ZWA.TO tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average while BANK.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian Core Financials Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZWA.TO returned 12.19%/yr vs 33.13%/yr for BANK.TO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZWA.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BANK.TO.

Performance

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZWA.TO achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than BANK.TO's 19.56% return.

ZWA.TO

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.89%
YTD
3.75%
6M
4.08%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
9.72%

BANK.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
5.40%
YTD
19.56%
6M
23.71%
1Y
58.24%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZWA.TO
BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF		3.75%10.55%12.02%12.15%-5.63%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund		19.56%41.00%27.90%16.23%-20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ZWA.TO and BANK.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022

0.65

The correlation between ZWA.TO and BANK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZWA.TO
BANK.TO

Financial Services

27.0%
100.0%

Industrials

17.8%

-

Technology

17.6%

-

Healthcare

13.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Energy

2.3%

-

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

ZWA.TO
27.0%
BANK.TO
100.0%

Industrials

ZWA.TO
17.8%
BANK.TO

-

Technology

ZWA.TO
17.6%
BANK.TO

-

Healthcare

ZWA.TO
13.0%
BANK.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZWA.TO
11.8%
BANK.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZWA.TO
4.4%
BANK.TO

-

Basic Materials

ZWA.TO
4.2%
BANK.TO

-

Energy

ZWA.TO
2.3%
BANK.TO

-

Communication Services

ZWA.TO
1.9%
BANK.TO

-

Real Estate

ZWA.TO

-

BANK.TO

-

Utilities

ZWA.TO

-

BANK.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF

Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Often compared with ZWA.TO:
ZWA.TO vs. ENCL.TOZWA.TO vs. BKCL.TOZWA.TO vs. EMAX.TOZWA.TO vs. CBNK.TOZWA.TO vs. CRCY.TOZWA.TO vs. ZWC.TOZWA.TO vs. CNQE.TO
Often compared with BANK.TO:
BANK.TO vs. HMAX.TOBANK.TO vs. HCAL.TOBANK.TO vs. VDY.TOBANK.TO vs. RBNK.TOBANK.TO vs. HYLD.TOBANK.TO vs. VCN.TOBANK.TO vs. VEQT.TO

Return for Risk

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZWA.TO
ZWA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ZWA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
BANK.TO
BANK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZWA.TOBANK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
4.80

-3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.15
6.55

-4.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.89

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

7.07

-5.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

31.23

-24.64

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWA.TO and BANK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZWA.TOBANK.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

4.80

-3.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.10

-0.49

Drawdowns

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWA.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than BANK.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWA.TO and BANK.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZWA.TOBANK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-29.03%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-8.27%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-15.49%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.68%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

0.00%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-8.79%

+5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.87%

+0.64%

Volatility

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA.TO) is 2.89%, while Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that ZWA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZWA.TOBANK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

4.19%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

10.55%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

12.19%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

15.68%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

15.68%

+1.33%

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWA.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BANK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZWA.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZWA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than BANK.TO's 12.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund		12.78%13.73%15.28%13.60%10.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWA.TO
BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF		5.65%5.65%5.89%6.21%6.02%4.36%5.04%4.46%4.74%4.15%4.83%4.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZWA.TO and BANK.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BANK.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BANK.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWA.TO.

ZWA.TO tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while BANK.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Core Financials Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO Asset Management and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWA.TO and 0.60% for BANK.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZWA.TO and BANK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer