ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO
ZWA.TO (BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF) and GOGY.TO (Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. ZWA.TO is passively managed, while GOGY.TO is actively managed. ZWA.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GOGY.TO.
Performance
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZWA.TO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
GOGY.TO
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZWA.TO
GOGY.TO
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF (ZWA.TO) and Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (GOGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZWA.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZWA.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZWA.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | — | — |
Volatility
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZWA.TO | GOGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | — | — |
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZWA.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GOGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZWA.TO vs. GOGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZWA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while GOGY.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOGY.TO Harvest Alphabet Enhanced High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZWA.TO BMO Covered Call Dow Jones Industrial Average Hedged to CAD ETF | 5.65% | 5.65% | 5.89% | 6.21% | 6.02% | 4.36% | 5.04% | 4.46% | 4.74% | 4.15% | 4.83% | 4.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GOGY.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOGY.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWA.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO Asset Management and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZWA.TO and 0.40% for GOGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZWA.TO and GOGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer