PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVU.TO achieves a 52.04% return, which is significantly higher than PXS.TO's 18.28% return.


ZVU.TO

1D
2.59%
1M
5.90%
YTD
52.04%
6M
44.48%
1Y
87.17%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
19.44%
10Y*

PXS.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.93%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.60%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
16.09%
10Y*
14.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZVU.TO
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF
52.04%26.27%15.99%11.16%-9.46%28.55%-3.01%21.68%-6.61%8.92%
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
18.28%13.64%26.23%12.41%-2.47%32.84%4.71%21.47%-1.23%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVU.TO and PXS.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.41

The correlation between ZVU.TO and PXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZVU.TO
PXS.TO

Technology

49.6%
24.6%

Financial Services

9.3%
14.7%

Healthcare

8.1%
11.5%

Communication Services

7.5%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
8.8%

Industrials

6.5%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.8%

Energy

3.0%
7.7%

Utilities

1.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.4%
3.3%

Technology

ZVU.TO
49.6%
PXS.TO
24.6%

Financial Services

ZVU.TO
9.3%
PXS.TO
14.7%

Healthcare

ZVU.TO
8.1%
PXS.TO
11.5%

Communication Services

ZVU.TO
7.5%
PXS.TO
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ZVU.TO
7.4%
PXS.TO
8.8%

Industrials

ZVU.TO
6.5%
PXS.TO
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZVU.TO
3.8%
PXS.TO
5.8%

Energy

ZVU.TO
3.0%
PXS.TO
7.7%

Utilities

ZVU.TO
1.8%
PXS.TO
2.8%

Real Estate

ZVU.TO
1.6%
PXS.TO
2.4%

Basic Materials

ZVU.TO
1.4%
PXS.TO
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVU.TO
ZVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PXS.TO
PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZVU.TOPXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.63

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.41

7.34

+7.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.20

26.12

+18.09

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is comparable to the PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVU.TO and PXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than PXS.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVU.TO and PXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVU.TOPXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-31.87%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-4.88%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-16.36%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-16.36%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-3.35%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.37%

+0.61%

Volatility

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) at 3.07%. This indicates that ZVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVU.TOPXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

3.07%

+3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.25%

8.35%

+7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.27%

11.07%

+11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

13.29%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

15.28%

+3.28%

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PXS.TO's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVU.TO vs. PXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZVU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than PXS.TO's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXS.TO
Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD
1.22%1.49%1.53%1.53%1.80%1.51%2.51%1.91%1.84%1.50%1.62%1.40%
ZVU.TO
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF
1.04%1.62%2.24%2.69%2.58%1.99%2.51%2.07%2.09%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVU.TO and PXS.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZVU.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZVU.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PXS.TO.

ZVU.TO tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Capped Index, while PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZVU.TO and 0.46% for PXS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVU.TO and PXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer