ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO).
ZVU.TO and CUD.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZVU.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2017. CUD.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats CAD Hedged Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011. Both ZVU.TO and CUD.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVU.TO BMO MSCI USA Value ETF | 5.24% | 20.00% | 15.86% | 11.00% | -9.58% | 28.41% | -3.14% | 21.55% | -7.25% |
CUD.TO iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 3.87% | 1.72% | 6.13% | 0.09% | -2.31% | 18.87% | -2.58% | 21.16% | -4.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZVU.TO achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than CUD.TO's 3.87% return.
ZVU.TO
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 25.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CUD.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 3.87%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 2.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZVU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CUD.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZVU.TO
CUD.TO
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) and iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZVU.TO | CUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.14 | +1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 0.31 | +1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 0.35 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.43 | 1.35 | +6.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZVU.TO | CUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.14 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.19 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZVU.TO and CUD.TO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZVU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than CUD.TO's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZVU.TO BMO MSCI USA Value ETF | 1.50% | 1.62% | 2.13% | 2.55% | 2.45% | 1.89% | 2.38% | 1.97% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CUD.TO iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.99% | 1.99% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.84% | 1.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 1.76% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum CUD.TO drawdown of -38.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVU.TO and CUD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZVU.TO | CUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -38.36% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -10.62% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.30% | -18.06% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -6.15% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -4.08% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 2.81% | +0.66% |
Volatility
ZVU.TO vs. CUD.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO MSCI USA Value ETF (ZVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to iShares US Dividend Growers Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CUD.TO) at 3.25%. This indicates that ZVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZVU.TO | CUD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 3.25% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 9.22% | +2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.17% | 15.89% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 14.71% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 17.20% | +0.57% |