PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZVOL vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZVOL vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVOL achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


ZVOL

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
2.14%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVOL vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
-2.29%-10.71%9.27%51.65%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVOL and OILK is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2023

0.00

The correlation between ZVOL and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZVOL vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVOL vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZVOLOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.42

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

6.91

-5.29

ZVOL vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVOL and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZVOLOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.06

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.12

+0.32

Drawdowns

ZVOL vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVOL drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVOL and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZVOLOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.25%

-83.76%

+46.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-17.35%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

-23.42%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.17%

-3.66%

-18.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-32.61%

+19.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

8.56%

-3.44%

Volatility

ZVOL vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) is 3.59%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that ZVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZVOLOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

10.44%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

23.26%

-9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

28.75%

-10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.27%

30.12%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.27%

35.97%

-6.70%

ZVOL vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVOL has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZVOL vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

ZVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.14%, more than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
71.14%53.44%30.68%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZVOL and OILK have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to ZVOL (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVOL dropped -37.25% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 19.03% vs 9.26% for ZVOL. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 71.14%, compared with 8.18% for OILK.

ZVOL is categorized as Volatility, while OILK is Oil & Gas. ZVOL tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid Term Futures Inverse Daily Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZVOL and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZVOL and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer