ZVGNX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

ZVGNX (Zevenbergen Genea Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ZVGNX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

ZVGNX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zevenbergen Genea Fund (ZVGNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZVGNX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FSPGX

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -8.25%
• 6M: -2.68%
• YTD: -3.37%
• 1Y: 4.12%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 11.03%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ZVGNX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZVGNX Zevenbergen Genea Fund	1.12%	15.60%	34.37%	71.41%	-58.89%	-4.33%	144.29%	28.33%	10.78%	51.69%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	-3.37%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVGNX and FSPGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.82

The correlation between ZVGNX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ZVGNX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZVGNX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZVGNX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Genea Fund (ZVGNX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZVGNX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.06	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.82	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ZVGNX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-32.66%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-11.36%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-6.36%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZVGNX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.77%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.56%	—

ZVGNX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVGNX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZVGNX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

ZVGNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.40%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%
ZVGNX Zevenbergen Genea Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZVGNX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

ZVGNX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.