ZVGNX vs. BLUEX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

ZVGNX (Zevenbergen Genea Fund) and BLUEX (AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ZVGNX returned 19.80%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for BLUEX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZVGNX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BLUEX.

Performance

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zevenbergen Genea Fund (ZVGNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZVGNX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ZVGNX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 19.80%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return.

ZVGNX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.08%
• 6M: 1.12%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 20.52%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 19.80%

BLUEX

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 4.53%
• 6M: -3.34%
• YTD: -3.29%
• 1Y: -4.51%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZVGNX Zevenbergen Genea Fund	1.12%	15.60%	34.37%	71.41%	-58.89%	-4.33%	144.29%	28.33%	10.78%	51.69%
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	-3.29%	4.45%	7.24%	14.35%	-14.30%	3.22%	34.74%	35.34%	-4.91%	27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZVGNX and BLUEX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between ZVGNX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZVGNX

ZVGNX Risk / Return Rank: 6
ZVGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ZVGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ZVGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ZVGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ZVGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

BLUEX

BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zevenbergen Genea Fund (ZVGNX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZVGNX	BLUEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	-0.42	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	-0.53	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.94	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	-0.37	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.62	-0.82	+1.44

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZVGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZVGNX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZVGNX drawdown since its inception was -68.81%, which is greater than BLUEX's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZVGNX and BLUEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZVGNX	BLUEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.81%	-54.27%	-14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.10%	-12.19%	-19.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.10%	-12.19%	-19.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.62%	-21.87%	-44.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.81%	-29.06%	-39.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.15%	-5.30%	-6.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-13.35%	-7.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.78%	5.39%	+8.39%

Volatility

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Zevenbergen Genea Fund (ZVGNX) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 4.45%. This indicates that ZVGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZVGNX	BLUEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.02%	4.45%	+5.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.62%	8.74%	+13.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.38%	10.72%	+17.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.99%	10.78%	+28.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.42%	16.55%	+18.87%

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZVGNX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZVGNX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

ZVGNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLUEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLUEX AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund	0.32%	0.31%	0.29%	0.03%	11.84%	27.20%	25.43%	13.71%	13.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
ZVGNX Zevenbergen Genea Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZVGNX and BLUEX in my portfolio?

ZVGNX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZVGNX or BLUEX?

ZVGNX has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to BLUEX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZVGNX dropped -68.81% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZVGNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.