ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO
ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) and ZGI.TO (BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index, while ZGI.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZUQ.TO returned 16.38%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for ZGI.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZUQ.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZGI.TO.
Performance
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZUQ.TO achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than ZGI.TO's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUQ.TO has outperformed ZGI.TO with an annualized return of 16.38%, while ZGI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.75% annualized return.
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
ZGI.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 11.48%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 13.70% | 0.94% | 25.35% | -0.72% | 4.48% | 26.79% | -10.51% | 25.17% | -0.82% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUQ.TO and ZGI.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZUQ.TO and ZGI.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Healthcare
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Communication Services
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Industrials
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
Financial Services
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
-
Energy
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
Utilities
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
Real Estate
ZUQ.TO
-
ZGI.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUQ.TO
ZGI.TO
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) and BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZUQ.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.17 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.73 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 4.81 | +1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZUQ.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.95 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.83 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.55 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum ZGI.TO drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUQ.TO and ZGI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUQ.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -34.76% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -6.66% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -10.07% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.94% | -16.70% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.94% | -34.76% | +7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -3.37% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -4.39% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 2.49% | +0.77% |
Volatility
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) is 2.31%, while BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI.TO) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that ZUQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUQ.TO | ZGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 5.08% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.60% | 9.82% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 12.19% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 13.24% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 15.93% | +1.59% |
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZUQ.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than ZGI.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZUQ.TO vs. ZGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than ZGI.TO's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGI.TO BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF | 2.32% | 2.72% | 2.75% | 3.25% | 2.94% | 2.98% | 3.66% | 2.78% | 2.92% | 2.53% | 3.21% | 2.90% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUQ.TO and ZGI.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUQ.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZGI.TO.
ZUQ.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZGI.TO is Industrials Equities. ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index, while ZGI.TO tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZUQ.TO and 0.61% for ZGI.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZUQ.TO and ZGI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer