PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUQ.TO achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than VUN.TO's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUQ.TO has outperformed VUN.TO with an annualized return of 16.90%, while VUN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.74% annualized return.


ZUQ.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
1.30%
YTD
10.92%
6M
5.60%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
16.90%

VUN.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.79%
YTD
12.60%
6M
11.57%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
15.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
10.92%5.80%34.06%33.29%-18.30%26.45%19.97%31.80%4.75%17.02%
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.60%11.43%33.76%23.00%-14.20%24.54%18.22%23.99%2.35%13.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUQ.TO and VUN.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.86

The correlation between ZUQ.TO and VUN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZUQ.TO
VUN.TO

Technology

34.5%
31.5%

Healthcare

15.2%
10.2%

Communication Services

14.3%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.0%
5.0%

Industrials

10.8%
9.9%

Financial Services

9.9%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
10.0%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.2%

Energy

0.2%
4.2%

Utilities

0.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Technology

ZUQ.TO
34.5%
VUN.TO
31.5%

Healthcare

ZUQ.TO
15.2%
VUN.TO
10.2%

Communication Services

ZUQ.TO
14.3%
VUN.TO
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

ZUQ.TO
11.0%
VUN.TO
5.0%

Industrials

ZUQ.TO
10.8%
VUN.TO
9.9%

Financial Services

ZUQ.TO
9.9%
VUN.TO
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ZUQ.TO
2.5%
VUN.TO
10.0%

Basic Materials

ZUQ.TO
1.6%
VUN.TO
2.2%

Energy

ZUQ.TO
0.2%
VUN.TO
4.2%

Utilities

ZUQ.TO
0.1%
VUN.TO
2.5%

Real Estate

ZUQ.TO

-

VUN.TO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZUQ.TO
ZUQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VUN.TO
VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZUQ.TOVUN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.15

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

11.67

-5.59

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUQ.TO and VUN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VUN.TO drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUQ.TO and VUN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZUQ.TOVUN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-28.19%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-8.51%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-19.88%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.93%

-23.67%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.93%

-28.19%

+1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.60%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-3.80%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.30%

+0.95%

Volatility

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) is 3.56%, while Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that ZUQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZUQ.TOVUN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

4.70%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.65%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

12.50%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

15.55%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

16.75%

+0.79%

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZUQ.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VUN.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZUQ.TO vs. VUN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VUN.TO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.84%0.93%1.10%1.21%0.97%1.15%1.45%1.52%1.39%1.50%1.49%
ZUQ.TO
BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF
0.43%0.48%0.60%0.90%1.03%0.83%1.00%1.00%1.12%1.25%1.26%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZUQ.TO and VUN.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUN.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUN.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.

ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index, while VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZUQ.TO and 0.17% for VUN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZUQ.TO and VUN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer