PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VUN.TO having a 12.43% return and VFV.TO slightly lower at 12.30%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VUN.TO having a 15.43% annualized return and VFV.TO not far ahead at 16.04%.


VUN.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
7.17%
YTD
12.43%
6M
10.44%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
15.43%

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
12.43%11.43%33.76%23.00%-14.20%24.54%18.22%23.99%2.35%13.01%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%15.62%25.14%2.94%13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VUN.TO and VFV.TO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2013

0.91

The correlation between VUN.TO and VFV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUN.TO
VFV.TO

Technology

31.5%
35.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.6%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.2%

Industrials

9.9%
8.3%

Communication Services

9.7%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.9%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Technology

VUN.TO
31.5%
VFV.TO
35.7%

Financial Services

VUN.TO
12.5%
VFV.TO
11.6%

Healthcare

VUN.TO
10.2%
VFV.TO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VUN.TO
10.0%
VFV.TO
10.2%

Industrials

VUN.TO
9.9%
VFV.TO
8.3%

Communication Services

VUN.TO
9.7%
VFV.TO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VUN.TO
5.0%
VFV.TO
4.9%

Energy

VUN.TO
4.2%
VFV.TO
3.5%

Utilities

VUN.TO
2.5%
VFV.TO
2.4%

Real Estate

VUN.TO
2.5%
VFV.TO
1.9%

Basic Materials

VUN.TO
2.2%
VFV.TO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUN.TO
VUN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUN.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.48

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.44

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.96

13.10

-0.13

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUN.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUN.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.59

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.97

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Drawdowns

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUN.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, roughly equal to the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUN.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUN.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-27.43%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-8.62%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

-19.05%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.67%

-22.19%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.19%

-27.43%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.18%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.35%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.26%

+0.01%

Volatility

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) have volatilities of 3.04% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUN.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.05%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

8.55%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

11.46%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

14.91%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

16.57%

+0.13%

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUN.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUN.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

VUN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
VUN.TO
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF
0.74%0.84%0.93%1.10%1.21%0.97%1.15%1.45%1.52%1.39%1.49%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VUN.TO and VFV.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for VUN.TO.

VUN.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. VUN.TO tracks CRSP US Total Market Index CAD, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for VUN.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUN.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer