PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO) and BMO US Preferred Share Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUP.TO achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than ZHP.TO's -1.32% return.


ZUP.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
-2.54%
6M
1.65%
YTD
3.28%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.10%

ZHP.TO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.39%
6M
-3.27%
YTD
-1.32%
1Y
-0.53%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$9.86KCA$16.90KCA$15.03K
CA$5.87KCA$8.06KCA$11.58K

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUP.TO
BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF
3.28%-4.11%17.52%3.56%-14.25%4.80%7.69%11.34%1.93%0.85%
ZHP.TO
BMO US Preferred Share Hedged to CAD Index ETF
-1.32%-1.34%7.03%4.43%-19.49%4.62%7.83%13.82%-5.84%4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUP.TO and ZHP.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2017

0.27

The correlation between ZUP.TO and ZHP.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZUP.TO
ZUP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ZUP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ZHP.TO
ZHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ZHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO) and BMO US Preferred Share Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZUP.TOZHP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.00

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.01

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

-0.02

+1.91

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the ZHP.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUP.TO and ZHP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUP.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum ZHP.TO drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUP.TO and ZHP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZUP.TOZHP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.93%

-41.53%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.76%

-6.26%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-11.80%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.34%

-30.45%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-13.79%

+9.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.33%

-8.69%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.49%

-1.07%

Volatility

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO) and BMO US Preferred Share Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZHP.TO) have volatilities of 2.49% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZUP.TOZHP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.56%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.03%

5.28%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

6.75%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

12.65%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.37%

15.89%

-1.52%

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZUP.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHP.TO's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZUP.TO vs. ZHP.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than ZHP.TO's 6.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZHP.TO
BMO US Preferred Share Hedged to CAD Index ETF
6.18%6.46%6.29%7.14%6.93%5.41%5.61%5.39%5.61%4.60%
ZUP.TO
BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF
5.58%6.51%5.82%6.88%6.33%5.28%5.81%5.52%5.29%5.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZUP.TO and ZHP.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZUP.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZUP.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for ZHP.TO.

ZUP.TO tracks Solactive US Preferred Share Select Index (NTR), while ZHP.TO tracks Solactive US Preferred Share Select Hedged to CAD Index (NTR). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ZUP.TO and 0.51% for ZHP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZUP.TO and ZHP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer