ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO
ZUP.TO (BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF) and HPR.TO (Global X Active Preferred Share ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ZUP.TO returned 1.32%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for HPR.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZUP.TO achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly lower than HPR.TO's 5.13% return.
ZUP.TO
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- —
HPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUP.TO BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF | 3.54% | -4.11% | 17.52% | 3.56% | -14.25% | 4.80% | 7.69% | 11.34% | 1.93% | 0.37% |
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 5.13% | 17.78% | 27.79% | 8.31% | -19.54% | 24.30% | 6.34% | 2.42% | -10.18% | 9.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUP.TO and HPR.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUP.TO
HPR.TO
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO) and Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZUP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.82 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 6.96 | -5.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 35.83 | -33.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUP.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, smaller than the maximum HPR.TO drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUP.TO and HPR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.93% | -45.02% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | -2.22% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -7.83% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.34% | -22.88% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -0.01% | -4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -6.16% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 0.43% | +1.92% |
Volatility
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF (ZUP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO) at 0.80%. This indicates that ZUP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 0.80% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.29% | 2.58% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.46% | 4.10% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 8.43% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 11.76% | +2.65% |
Dividends
ZUP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than HPR.TO's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.78% | 4.34% | 4.28% | 5.56% | 5.96% | 4.01% | 5.11% | 4.87% | 4.39% | 3.88% | 4.32% | 4.60% |
ZUP.TO BMO US Preferred Share Index ETF | 6.13% | 6.51% | 5.82% | 6.88% | 6.33% | 5.28% | 5.81% | 5.52% | 5.29% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUP.TO and HPR.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X.
Find the right allocation for ZUP.TO and HPR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer