ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO
ZUD.TO (BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZUD.TO is a Dividend fund managed by BMO, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Over the past 10 years, ZUD.TO returned 9.32%/yr vs 17.32%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZUD.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZUD.TO achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 32.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUD.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 9.32%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.
ZUD.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 11.13%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 6M
- 31.46%
- 1Y
- 71.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.64%
- 5Y*
- 20.81%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 14.29% | 11.69% | 15.31% | 6.36% | -7.23% | 25.80% | -5.27% | 21.08% | -5.69% | 13.59% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 32.05% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUD.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ZUD.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUD.TO
ZEB.TO
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZUD.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 2.01 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 8.48 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 36.45 | -24.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, roughly equal to the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUD.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUD.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -39.69% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -8.44% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.94% | -14.80% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -25.97% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -39.69% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | 0.00% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -5.63% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.96% | -0.20% |
Volatility
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) at 3.10%. This indicates that ZUD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUD.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.10% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 11.14% | -3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 12.88% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 13.55% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.87% | +0.12% |
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZUD.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZUD.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.30% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 1.47% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 2.50% | 3.76% | 3.13% | 3.11% | 2.69% | 2.61% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUD.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZUD.TO.
ZUD.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZUD.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZUD.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer