ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
ZUD.TO (BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds from BMO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZUD.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZUD.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 9.48% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 14.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUD.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUD.TO
ZDIV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZUD.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUD.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUD.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -2.60% | -38.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.28% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -0.56% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUD.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 9.81% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 9.81% | +5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 9.81% | +7.18% |
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZUD.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZUD.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than ZDIV.TO's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 1.47% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 2.50% | 3.76% | 3.13% | 3.11% | 2.69% | 2.61% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUD.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZUD.TO.
Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZUD.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZUD.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer