PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUD.TO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUD.TO has underperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 8.84%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


ZUD.TO

1D
0.58%
1M
0.79%
6M
12.43%
YTD
14.56%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
8.84%
ALL TIME*
10.12%

PDC.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
3.43%
6M
22.60%
YTD
26.09%
1Y
38.58%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.82%
10Y*
11.35%
ALL TIME*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$76.46KCA$67.75KCA$95.06K
CA$37.20KCA$54.71KCA$83.31K

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUD.TO
BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF
14.56%11.69%15.31%6.36%-7.23%25.80%-5.27%21.08%-5.69%13.59%
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
26.09%21.80%16.38%6.97%-4.17%30.14%-5.48%25.00%-11.85%10.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUD.TO and PDC.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

0.54

The correlation between ZUD.TO and PDC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO

Technology

33.6%
0.7%

Healthcare

11.4%

-

Financial Services

8.9%
45.6%

Energy

8.6%
20.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
0.8%

Communication Services

6.9%
4.4%

Utilities

6.2%
14.2%

Real Estate

5.5%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
6.7%

Industrials

4.3%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.6%
3.7%

Technology

ZUD.TO
33.6%
PDC.TO
0.7%

Healthcare

ZUD.TO
11.4%
PDC.TO

-

Financial Services

ZUD.TO
8.9%
PDC.TO
45.6%

Energy

ZUD.TO
8.6%
PDC.TO
20.4%

Consumer Defensive

ZUD.TO
8.0%
PDC.TO
0.8%

Communication Services

ZUD.TO
6.9%
PDC.TO
4.4%

Utilities

ZUD.TO
6.2%
PDC.TO
14.2%

Real Estate

ZUD.TO
5.5%
PDC.TO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ZUD.TO
5.0%
PDC.TO
6.7%

Industrials

ZUD.TO
4.3%
PDC.TO
1.1%

Basic Materials

ZUD.TO
1.6%
PDC.TO
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZUD.TO
ZUD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ZUD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZUD.TOPDC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.89

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

10.03

-6.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

36.85

-24.77

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUD.TO and PDC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, roughly equal to the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUD.TO and PDC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZUD.TOPDC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-41.93%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.67%

-3.86%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

-10.52%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

-17.98%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

-41.93%

+1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.33%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.48%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.05%

+0.61%

Volatility

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that ZUD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZUD.TOPDC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.41%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

6.51%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

8.58%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

10.83%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

15.28%

+1.70%

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZUD.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than PDC.TO's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.14%3.96%4.48%4.77%4.24%3.65%5.07%4.33%5.12%4.23%3.77%4.39%
ZUD.TO
BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF
1.47%1.68%2.17%2.54%2.77%2.50%3.76%3.13%3.11%2.69%2.61%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZUD.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZUD.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZUD.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZUD.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZUD.TO and PDC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer