ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO
ZUD.TO (BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. ZUD.TO is actively managed, while PDC.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZUD.TO returned 8.84%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for PDC.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZUD.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZUD.TO achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 26.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUD.TO has underperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 8.84%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.
ZUD.TO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 20.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.12%
PDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 1Y
- 38.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.46K | CA$67.75K | CA$95.06K | |
| CA$37.20K | CA$54.71K | CA$83.31K |
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 14.56% | 11.69% | 15.31% | 6.36% | -7.23% | 25.80% | -5.27% | 21.08% | -5.69% | 13.59% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 26.09% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUD.TO and PDC.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ZUD.TO and PDC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Healthcare
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
-
Financial Services
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Energy
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Communication Services
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Utilities
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Real Estate
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Industrials
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUD.TO
PDC.TO
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZUD.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.89 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 10.03 | -6.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 36.85 | -24.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, roughly equal to the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUD.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUD.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -41.93% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -3.86% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.94% | -10.52% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -17.98% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -41.93% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.33% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -4.48% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.05% | +0.61% |
Volatility
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) at 2.41%. This indicates that ZUD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUD.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 2.41% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 6.51% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 8.58% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 10.83% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.28% | +1.70% |
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZUD.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZUD.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than PDC.TO's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.14% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 1.47% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 2.50% | 3.76% | 3.13% | 3.11% | 2.69% | 2.61% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUD.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUD.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUD.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZUD.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZUD.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer