ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO
ZUD.TO (BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF) and FCCD.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 5 years, ZUD.TO returned 10.22%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for FCCD.TO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZUD.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCD.TO.
Performance
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZUD.TO having a 14.29% return and FCCD.TO slightly lower at 13.97%.
ZUD.TO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
FCCD.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 30.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- —
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 14.29% | 11.69% | 15.31% | 6.36% | -7.23% | 25.80% | -5.27% | 21.08% | -10.85% |
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 13.97% | 25.05% | 16.92% | 3.35% | -4.04% | 29.46% | -8.44% | 20.71% | -8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUD.TO and FCCD.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between ZUD.TO and FCCD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUD.TO
FCCD.TO
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZUD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.67 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 5.49 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 25.50 | -13.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum FCCD.TO drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUD.TO and FCCD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -43.53% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -5.67% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.94% | -9.94% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.65% | -19.24% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.41% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -6.33% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.22% | +0.54% |
Volatility
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF (ZUD.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) at 2.71%. This indicates that ZUD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUD.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 2.71% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 7.01% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.46% | 8.60% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 11.52% | +3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.03% | -0.04% |
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZUD.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCD.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZUD.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FCCD.TO's 3.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 3.03% | 3.56% | 4.27% | 4.65% | 4.01% | 3.02% | 4.74% | 3.80% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZUD.TO BMO US Dividend Hedged to CAD ETF | 1.47% | 1.68% | 2.17% | 2.54% | 2.77% | 2.50% | 3.76% | 3.13% | 3.11% | 2.69% | 2.61% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUD.TO and FCCD.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUD.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUD.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FCCD.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZUD.TO and 0.35% for FCCD.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZUD.TO and FCCD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer