ZTWO vs. VSDB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB).

ZTWO and VSDB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZTWO is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. VSDB is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Apr 1, 2025.

Performance

ZTWO vs. VSDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZTWO vs. VSDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.29%	3.67%
VSDB Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares	0.31%	4.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than VSDB's 0.31% return.

ZTWO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VSDB

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTWO vs. VSDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZTWO and VSDB have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ZTWO

F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

VSDB

Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares

Return for Risk

ZTWO vs. VSDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO

ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTWO vs. VSDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares (VSDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZTWO	VSDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZTWO	VSDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.24	2.75	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between ZTWO and VSDB is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZTWO vs. VSDB - Dividend Comparison

ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, which matches VSDB's 4.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.19%	4.31%	0.39%
VSDB Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF Shares	4.20%	3.30%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZTWO vs. VSDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum VSDB drawdown of -1.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and VSDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTWO	VSDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-1.42%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.79%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-0.17%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZTWO	VSDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53%	1.91%	-0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.50%	1.91%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.50%	1.91%	-0.41%