ZTWO vs. USTB
Compare and contrast key facts about F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB).
ZTWO and USTB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZTWO is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. USTB is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017. Both ZTWO and USTB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZTWO vs. USTB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZTWO vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.29% | 5.49% | 0.36% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 0.35% | 6.08% | 0.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 0.35% return.
ZTWO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USTB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZTWO vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZTWO vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank
ZTWO
USTB
ZTWO vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZTWO | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.74 | 3.12 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.28 | 4.97 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.73 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 5.47 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.63 | 23.81 | -3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZTWO | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 3.12 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.24 | 1.70 | +1.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZTWO and USTB is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZTWO vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison
ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than USTB's 4.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.19% | 4.31% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.61% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 2.32% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
ZTWO vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum USTB drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and USTB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZTWO | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -5.32% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -0.84% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.59% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.67% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.21% | 0.19% | +0.02% |
Volatility
ZTWO vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) at 0.49%. This indicates that ZTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZTWO | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.49% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.89% | 0.83% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53% | 1.49% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.50% | 2.01% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.50% | 2.02% | -0.52% |