PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTWO vs. USTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTWO vs. USTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 1.19% return.


ZTWO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USTB

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTWO vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.89%5.49%0.36%
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
1.19%6.08%0.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTWO and USTB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.78

The correlation between ZTWO and USTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTWO vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

USTB
USTB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
USTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
USTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTWO vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTWOUSTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.88

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

5.65

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.46

25.66

-5.20

ZTWO vs. USTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTWO Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is comparable to the USTB Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTWO and USTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTWOUSTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

3.93

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.16

1.73

+1.42

Drawdowns

ZTWO vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum USTB drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and USTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTWOUSTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-5.32%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

-0.84%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.04%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.66%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

0.19%

+0.01%

Volatility

ZTWO vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison

F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) at 0.33%. This indicates that ZTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTWOUSTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

0.33%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

0.84%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

1.22%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.49%

2.01%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.49%

2.01%

-0.52%

ZTWO vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTWO vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison

ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than USTB's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
4.58%4.62%5.05%4.49%2.54%1.84%2.59%2.69%2.32%0.43%
ZTWO
F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.12%4.31%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTWO and USTB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTWO has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to USTB (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTWO dropped -0.93% vs USTB's -5.32%.

On 1-year performance, USTB leads with 4.75% vs 4.02% for ZTWO. On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USTB has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for USTB.

USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.

ZTWO tracks ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USTB tracks Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTWO and 0.34% for USTB.

USTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTWO and USTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer