PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTWO vs. TAXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.99% return.


ZTWO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXS

1D
0.06%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZTWO and TAXS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTWO vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTWOTAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.10

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTWOTAXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.17

2.85

+0.33

Drawdowns

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and TAXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTWOTAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-0.84%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.03%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.24%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

Volatility

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTWOTAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

1.00%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.49%

1.00%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.49%

1.00%

+0.49%

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZTWO vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison

ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than TAXS's 1.82% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZTWO and TAXS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZTWO.

ZTWO has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.82% for TAXS.

ZTWO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while TAXS is Municipal Bonds. ZTWO tracks ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTWO and 0.05% for TAXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTWO and TAXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer