ZTWO vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ZTWO (F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZTWO is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. ZTWO is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. Over the past year, ZTWO returned 3.70% vs 56.15% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. ZTWO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

ZTWO vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTWO achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 14.96% return.

ZTWO

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: 3.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BESF

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -7.22%
• YTD: 14.96%
• 6M: 14.44%
• 1Y: 56.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTWO vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.87%	3.10%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	14.96%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTWO and BESF is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.27

Return for Risk

ZTWO vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO

ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 88
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 75
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTWO vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZTWO	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	2.28	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.40	3.08	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.37	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.98	5.14	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.68	14.33	+4.35

ZTWO vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTWO and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZTWO vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTWO drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTWO and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTWO	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-10.97%	+10.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.93%	-10.97%	+10.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-9.64%	+9.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-2.72%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	3.93%	-3.73%

Volatility

ZTWO vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) is 0.46%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that ZTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTWO	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	6.87%	-6.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.02%	14.94%	-13.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34%	24.78%	-23.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.50%	24.42%	-22.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.50%	24.42%	-22.92%

ZTWO vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZTWO vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than BESF's 5.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.92%	6.39%	0.00%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.31%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZTWO and BESF in my portfolio?

ZTWO and BESF have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZTWO or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to ZTWO (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTWO dropped -0.93% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, ZTWO or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 56.15% vs 3.70% for ZTWO. On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZTWO or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 56.15% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZTWO or BESF?

ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZTWO or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.

What is the main difference between ZTWO and BESF?

ZTWO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZTWO and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.