ZTIP.TO vs. XLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZTIP.TO (BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZTIP.TO is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZTIP.TO returned 6.29%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for XLV. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZTIP.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.

Performance

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZTIP.TO is traded in CAD, while XLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTIP.TO achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -3.07% return.

ZTIP.TO

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 3.34%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: 6.13%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: —

XLV

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: -3.07%
• 6M: -4.43%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF	3.34%	1.12%	13.84%	1.93%	3.96%	4.47%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	-3.07%	9.25%	11.28%	-0.18%	4.90%	20.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTIP.TO and XLV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021	0.11

Return for Risk

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTIP.TO

ZTIP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 36
ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ZTIP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ZTIP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ZTIP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
ZTIP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 24
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZTIP.TO	XLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	0.96	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	1.50	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.17	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.21	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	2.80	+1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTIP.TO and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZTIP.TO	XLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	0.96	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	0.62	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.93	-0.08

Drawdowns

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTIP.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTIP.TO and XLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTIP.TO	XLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.60%	-21.51%	+15.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.78%	-11.95%	+8.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.60%	-17.43%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.60%	-17.43%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.63%	+7.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-4.10%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	5.13%	-3.72%

Volatility

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) is 0.77%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that ZTIP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTIP.TO	XLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	4.40%	-3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	10.89%	-7.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.67%	14.96%	-10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.36%	13.95%	-7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.28%	15.74%	-9.46%

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTIP.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZTIP.TO vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

ZTIP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than XLV's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.70%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF	3.43%	3.63%	3.63%	4.91%	4.93%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZTIP.TO and XLV in my portfolio?

ZTIP.TO and XLV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZTIP.TO or XLV?

On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZTIP.TO or XLV?

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZTIP.TO.

What is the main difference between ZTIP.TO and XLV?

ZTIP.TO is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. ZTIP.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ZTIP.TO and 0.08% for XLV.