PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) and Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZTIP.TO is traded in CAD, while AVIV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVIV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTIP.TO achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than AVIV's 12.92% return.


ZTIP.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
2.04%
YTD
3.34%
6M
1.60%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*

AVIV

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
12.92%
6M
14.44%
1Y
34.02%
3Y*
23.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZTIP.TO
BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF
3.34%1.12%13.84%1.93%3.96%0.45%
AVIV
Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF
12.92%35.29%13.26%15.86%-1.73%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTIP.TO and AVIV is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTIP.TO
ZTIP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTIP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AVIV
AVIV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AVIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AVIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) and Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTIP.TOAVIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.26

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

13.58

-9.31

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the AVIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTIP.TO and AVIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTIP.TOAVIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.63

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.17

-0.33

Drawdowns

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTIP.TO drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum AVIV drawdown of -21.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTIP.TO and AVIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTIP.TOAVIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-21.43%

+15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.78%

-10.49%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.60%

-14.49%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-3.55%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

2.51%

-1.10%

Volatility

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) is 0.77%, while Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF (AVIV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that ZTIP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTIP.TOAVIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

4.14%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

10.96%

-7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.67%

13.00%

-8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

13.73%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

13.73%

-7.45%

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTIP.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than AVIV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZTIP.TO vs. AVIV - Dividend Comparison

ZTIP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than AVIV's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVIV
Avantis International Large Cap Value ETF
2.82%3.01%3.46%3.64%2.84%0.57%
ZTIP.TO
BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF
3.43%3.63%3.63%4.91%4.93%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTIP.TO and AVIV have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZTIP.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZTIP.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVIV.

ZTIP.TO is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while AVIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ZTIP.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index, while AVIV tracks MSCI World ex-U.S. Value Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ZTIP.TO and 0.25% for AVIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTIP.TO and AVIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer