ZTAX vs. MMCA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA).

ZTAX and MMCA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZTAX is an actively managed fund by X-Square. It was launched on May 18, 2023. MMCA is an actively managed fund by IndexIQ. It was launched on Dec 21, 2021.

Performance

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZTAX X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF	0.90%	-1.02%	7.98%	9.14%
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	-0.20%	5.74%	1.70%	4.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than MMCA's -0.20% return.

ZTAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 4.82%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMCA

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: -0.20%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 3.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than MMCA's 0.36% expense ratio.

ZTAX

X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF

MMCA

IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF

Return for Risk

ZTAX vs. MMCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTAX

ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MMCA

MMCA Risk / Return Rank: 66
MMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
MMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
MMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
MMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZTAX	MMCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	1.37	-1.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	1.79	-1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.30	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	1.65	-1.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.39	5.93	-4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the MMCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTAX and MMCA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZTAX	MMCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	1.37	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.02	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ZTAX and MMCA is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Dividend Comparison

ZTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than MMCA's 3.35% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZTAX X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF	4.52%	4.58%	4.55%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.35%	3.39%	3.66%	3.57%	2.90%	0.05%

Drawdowns

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTAX drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, roughly equal to the maximum MMCA drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTAX and MMCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTAX	MMCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.33%	-15.97%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-3.01%	-7.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-2.37%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.87%	-7.26%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	0.84%	+3.08%

Volatility

ZTAX vs. MMCA - Volatility Comparison

X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) at 1.18%. This indicates that ZTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTAX	MMCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.47%	1.18%	+8.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.05%	1.78%	+22.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.93%	3.42%	+22.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.25%	3.64%	+23.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.25%	3.64%	+23.61%