ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO
ZSU.TO (BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and QSB.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, ZSU.TO returned 1.19%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for QSB.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSU.TO achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than QSB.TO's 1.21% return.
ZSU.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.62%
QSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSU.TO BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -0.19% | 4.61% | 3.84% | 5.18% | -6.17% | -0.99% | 4.54% | 5.57% | 0.12% |
QSB.TO Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 1.21% | 3.74% | 5.59% | 5.22% | -3.90% | -1.16% | 4.58% | 4.15% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSU.TO and QSB.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSU.TO
QSB.TO
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO) and Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZSU.TO | QSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.32 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.53 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 8.49 | -5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than QSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSU.TO and QSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSU.TO | QSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -6.73% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | -1.26% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.49% | -1.26% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -6.72% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.32% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -1.14% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.38% | +0.19% |
Volatility
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO) at 0.52%. This indicates that ZSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSU.TO | QSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.52% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.78% | 1.62% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58% | 2.05% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.68% | 2.57% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.46% | 2.45% | +2.01% |
Dividends
ZSU.TO vs. QSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than QSB.TO's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSB.TO Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 2.83% | 2.96% | 3.13% | 2.63% | 2.02% | 2.21% | 1.60% | 2.22% | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSU.TO BMO Short-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 4.31% | 3.76% | 3.31% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 2.97% | 2.99% | 2.78% | 2.49% | 2.30% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSU.TO and QSB.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Mackenzie.
Find the right allocation for ZSU.TO and QSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer