QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO
QSB.TO (Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF) and RUSB.TO (RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QSB.TO returned 2.19%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for RUSB.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSB.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than RUSB.TO's 3.34% return.
QSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- —
RUSB.TO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSB.TO Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 1.16% | 3.74% | 5.59% | 5.22% | -3.90% | -1.16% | 4.58% | 4.15% | 0.90% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 3.34% | 1.61% | 13.88% | 3.94% | -0.28% | -0.52% | 1.46% | 2.36% | 11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSB.TO and RUSB.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018 | 0.13 |
The correlation between QSB.TO and RUSB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QSB.TO
RUSB.TO
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO) and RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSB.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 1.81 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 3.97 | +4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.73%, smaller than the maximum RUSB.TO drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSB.TO and RUSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSB.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -14.28% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.26% | -3.60% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.26% | -5.26% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.72% | -8.10% | +1.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.54% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -4.11% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 1.64% | -1.26% |
Volatility
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF (QSB.TO) is 0.51%, while RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that QSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSB.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 2.05% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 4.25% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05% | 6.45% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.57% | 7.05% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 6.96% | -4.51% |
Dividends
QSB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
QSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than RUSB.TO's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSB.TO Mackenzie Canadian Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 2.83% | 2.96% | 3.13% | 2.63% | 2.02% | 2.21% | 1.60% | 2.22% | 1.91% | 0.00% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 4.13% | 3.96% | 3.38% | 3.26% | 2.48% | 2.30% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 1.90% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSB.TO and RUSB.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and RBC.
Find the right allocation for QSB.TO and RUSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer