PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSTK vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZSTK vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSTK achieves a -75.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's -4.23% return.


ZSTK

1D
-1.30%
1M
-54.63%
6M
-86.76%
YTD
-75.72%
1Y
-92.36%
3Y*
-74.39%
5Y*
-80.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-78.17%

NVO

1D
-8.78%
1M
-6.64%
6M
-18.01%
YTD
-4.23%
1Y
2.25%
3Y*
-14.32%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
7.55%
ALL TIME*
14.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$504.41M$480.49M$577.88M
$30.91K$67.40K$61.75K

ZSTK vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZSTK
ZeroStack Corp.
-75.72%-84.42%-23.70%-70.34%-87.21%-67.64%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-4.23%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSTK and NVO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021

0.10

The correlation between ZSTK and NVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZSTK:

$1.59M

NVO:

$209.19B

EPS

ZSTK:

-$17.81

NVO:

DKK 27.42

PS Ratio

ZSTK:

0.38

NVO:

4.15

PB Ratio

ZSTK:

1.10

NVO:

6.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZSTK:

$40.03M

NVO:

DKK 327.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZSTK:

-$1.25M

NVO:

DKK 268.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZSTK:

-$33.62M

NVO:

DKK 181.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSTK vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZSTK
ZSTK Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ZSTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSTK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSTK Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZSTK vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSTKNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.06

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

0.11

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

0.20

-1.49

ZSTK vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSTK Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSTK and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSTK vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSTK drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSTK and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSTKNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-74.70%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-95.97%

-43.67%

-52.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.10%

-74.70%

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.99%

-74.70%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-65.79%

-34.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.65%

-17.93%

-74.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.05%

23.97%

+48.08%

Volatility

ZSTK vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) has a higher volatility of 32.02% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 12.28%. This indicates that ZSTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSTKNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.02%

12.28%

+19.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

89.72%

36.87%

+52.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

147.84%

46.77%

+101.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.18%

38.76%

+94.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.70%

32.76%

+103.94%

Dividends

ZSTK vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

ZSTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
3.83%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
ZSTK
ZeroStack Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZSTK vs. NVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZeroStack Corp. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSTK and NVO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZSTK has higher volatility (32.02%) compared to NVO (12.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSTK dropped -99.99% vs NVO's -74.70%.

NVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSTK and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer