ZSTK vs. NVO
ZSTK (ZeroStack Corp.) and NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) are both stocks. ZSTK operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while NVO operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, ZSTK returned -80.99%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for NVO. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZSTK vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSTK achieves a -75.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's -4.23% return.
ZSTK
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -54.63%
- 6M
- -86.76%
- YTD
- -75.72%
- 1Y
- -92.36%
- 3Y*
- -74.39%
- 5Y*
- -80.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -78.17%
NVO
- 1D
- -8.78%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- -14.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.41M | $480.49M | $577.88M | |
ZSTK ZeroStack Corp. | $30.91K | $67.40K | $61.75K |
ZSTK vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSTK ZeroStack Corp. | -75.72% | -84.42% | -23.70% | -70.34% | -87.21% | -67.64% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -4.23% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 47.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSTK and NVO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between ZSTK and NVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZSTK:
$1.59M
NVO:
$209.19B
ZSTK:
-$17.81
NVO:
DKK 27.42
ZSTK:
0.38
NVO:
4.15
ZSTK:
1.10
NVO:
6.70
ZSTK:
$40.03M
NVO:
DKK 327.80B
ZSTK:
-$1.25M
NVO:
DKK 268.30B
ZSTK:
-$33.62M
NVO:
DKK 181.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSTK vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSTK
NVO
ZSTK vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZSTK | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 0.11 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 0.20 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZSTK vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSTK drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSTK and NVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSTK | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -74.70% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.97% | -43.67% | -52.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.10% | -74.70% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.99% | -74.70% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -65.79% | -34.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.65% | -17.93% | -74.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.05% | 23.97% | +48.08% |
Volatility
ZSTK vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) has a higher volatility of 32.02% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 12.28%. This indicates that ZSTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSTK | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.02% | 12.28% | +19.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.72% | 36.87% | +52.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.84% | 46.77% | +101.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.18% | 38.76% | +94.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.70% | 32.76% | +103.94% |
Dividends
ZSTK vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
ZSTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 3.83% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
ZSTK ZeroStack Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZSTK vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZeroStack Corp. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSTK and NVO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSTK has higher volatility (32.02%) compared to NVO (12.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSTK dropped -99.99% vs NVO's -74.70%.
NVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSTK and NVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer