ZSTK vs. BMBOY
ZSTK (ZeroStack Corp.) and BMBOY (Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV ADR) are both stocks. ZSTK operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while BMBOY operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, ZSTK returned -72.88%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for BMBOY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSTK achieves a -35.46% return, which is significantly lower than BMBOY's 1.35% return.
ZSTK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -35.46%
- 6M
- -46.53%
- 1Y
- -84.28%
- 3Y*
- -67.86%
- 5Y*
- -72.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BMBOY
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- -13.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSTK ZeroStack Corp. | -35.46% | -84.42% | -23.70% | -70.34% | -87.21% | -67.64% |
BMBOY Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV ADR | 1.35% | 27.07% | -48.59% | 21.25% | 31.98% | 75.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSTK and BMBOY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between ZSTK and BMBOY shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZSTK:
-$221.74
BMBOY:
MX$10.80
ZSTK:
0.09
BMBOY:
0.57
ZSTK:
$23.89M
BMBOY:
MX$422.73B
ZSTK:
-$7.71M
BMBOY:
MX$217.77B
ZSTK:
-$9.88M
BMBOY:
MX$63.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSTK vs. BMBOY — Risk / Return Rank
ZSTK
BMBOY
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) and Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV ADR (BMBOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZSTK | BMBOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.15 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 0.91 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 1.90 | -3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSTK drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than BMBOY's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSTK and BMBOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSTK | BMBOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -56.90% | -43.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.94% | -21.74% | -66.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.30% | -54.90% | -42.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.97% | -56.90% | -43.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.97% | -40.37% | -59.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.49% | -22.71% | -69.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.47% | 10.45% | +55.02% |
Volatility
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Volatility Comparison
ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK) has a higher volatility of 21.59% compared to Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV ADR (BMBOY) at 9.38%. This indicates that ZSTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMBOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSTK | BMBOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.59% | 9.38% | +12.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.61% | 28.00% | +79.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 144.85% | 40.74% | +104.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 137.70% | 49.58% | +88.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.17% | 52.25% | +84.92% |
Dividends
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Dividend Comparison
ZSTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMBOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBOY Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV ADR | 1.90% | 1.57% | 2.12% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.34% |
ZSTK ZeroStack Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZSTK vs. BMBOY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZeroStack Corp. and Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSTK and BMBOY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZSTK has higher volatility (21.59%) compared to BMBOY (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSTK dropped -99.97% vs BMBOY's -56.90%.
BMBOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZSTK and BMBOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer