PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI USA SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ZSRM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSRM.DE achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than EMEC.DE's 10.95% return.


ZSRM.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
6.90%
YTD
10.14%
6M
9.61%
1Y
11.04%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
10Y*

EMEC.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.53%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.06%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZSRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI USA SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
10.14%-6.25%17.05%19.31%-8.53%
EMEC.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR
10.95%5.92%10.86%19.48%-7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSRM.DE and EMEC.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.83

The correlation between ZSRM.DE and EMEC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSRM.DE
ZSRM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ZSRM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSRM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSRM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSRM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSRM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEC.DE
EMEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI USA SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ZSRM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSRM.DEEMEC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.31

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.64

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

9.05

-5.51

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSRM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the EMEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSRM.DE and EMEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSRM.DEEMEC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.73

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.82

-0.41

Drawdowns

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSRM.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum EMEC.DE drawdown of -30.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSRM.DE and EMEC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSRM.DEEMEC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-30.18%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-7.95%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.72%

-20.78%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-0.24%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-5.05%

-2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.32%

+0.81%

Volatility

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI USA SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ZSRM.DE) is 3.16%, while BNP Paribas Easy ECPI Circular Economy Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (EMEC.DE) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that ZSRM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSRM.DEEMEC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.47%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

8.86%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

12.15%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

14.05%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.00%

-0.12%

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSRM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEC.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSRM.DE vs. EMEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZSRM.DE nor EMEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSRM.DE and EMEC.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSRM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EMEC.DE.

ZSRM.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMEC.DE is Global Equities. ZSRM.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while EMEC.DE tracks ECPI Circular Economy Leaders Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZSRM.DE and 0.30% for EMEC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSRM.DE and EMEC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer