PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSP.TO achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than USCC.TO's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO has outperformed USCC.TO with an annualized return of 15.98%, while USCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.


ZSP.TO

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.18%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.04%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
15.98%

USCC.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
6.39%
YTD
9.71%
6M
8.43%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
12.15%12.02%35.07%23.30%-12.68%27.53%15.61%24.69%3.24%13.54%
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
9.71%9.20%31.13%13.91%-10.22%20.61%9.31%15.08%0.57%6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSP.TO and USCC.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2014

0.55

Over the past year, ZSP.TO and USCC.TO have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZSP.TO
USCC.TO

Technology

35.5%
35.6%

Financial Services

12.1%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.5%

Industrials

8.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.3%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

ZSP.TO
35.5%
USCC.TO
35.6%

Financial Services

ZSP.TO
12.1%
USCC.TO
11.8%

Communication Services

ZSP.TO
10.9%
USCC.TO
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ZSP.TO
10.3%
USCC.TO
10.1%

Healthcare

ZSP.TO
8.7%
USCC.TO
8.5%

Industrials

ZSP.TO
8.4%
USCC.TO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

ZSP.TO
4.8%
USCC.TO
4.9%

Energy

ZSP.TO
3.3%
USCC.TO
3.5%

Utilities

ZSP.TO
2.3%
USCC.TO
2.4%

Real Estate

ZSP.TO
2.0%
USCC.TO
1.9%

Basic Materials

ZSP.TO
1.8%
USCC.TO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

USCC.TO
USCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSP.TOUSCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.53

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.68

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

15.14

-2.44

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the USCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSP.TO and USCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSP.TOUSCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.65

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.93

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.96

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.95

+0.20

Drawdowns

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum USCC.TO drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP.TO and USCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSP.TOUSCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.94%

-28.48%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-6.71%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-17.55%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-17.55%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.94%

-28.48%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-3.46%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.63%

+0.66%

Volatility

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCC.TO) at 2.12%. This indicates that ZSP.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSP.TOUSCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.12%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

7.45%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

9.32%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

14.97%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

17.36%

-1.00%

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than USCC.TO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSP.TO vs. USCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than USCC.TO's 9.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USCC.TO
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
9.56%10.20%9.65%8.50%7.94%4.02%3.85%3.89%4.76%4.29%4.68%4.78%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.75%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.44%1.47%1.63%1.63%2.20%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ZSP.TO and USCC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for USCC.TO.

ZSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while USCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP.TO and 0.49% for USCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSP.TO and USCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer