PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSP.TO vs. IVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZSP.TO is traded in CAD, while IVLU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IVLU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSP.TO achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP.TO has outperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 16.03%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.11% annualized return.


ZSP.TO

1D
0.34%
1M
2.27%
YTD
10.37%
6M
9.38%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
16.03%

IVLU

1D
0.73%
1M
2.13%
YTD
13.01%
6M
15.46%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
25.11%
5Y*
17.00%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
10.37%12.36%35.07%23.30%-12.68%27.54%15.61%24.69%3.28%13.60%
IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
13.01%39.42%15.81%17.21%0.24%15.55%-6.76%10.84%-7.97%14.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSP.TO and IVLU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2015

0.43

The correlation between ZSP.TO and IVLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZSP.TO
IVLU

Technology

36.2%
11.3%

Financial Services

11.9%
25.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.7%

Industrials

8.2%
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
6.3%

Energy

3.5%
5.1%

Utilities

2.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
7.5%

Technology

ZSP.TO
36.2%
IVLU
11.3%

Financial Services

ZSP.TO
11.9%
IVLU
25.3%

Communication Services

ZSP.TO
10.9%
IVLU
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ZSP.TO
10.1%
IVLU
7.4%

Healthcare

ZSP.TO
8.4%
IVLU
9.7%

Industrials

ZSP.TO
8.2%
IVLU
17.2%

Consumer Defensive

ZSP.TO
4.8%
IVLU
6.3%

Energy

ZSP.TO
3.5%
IVLU
5.1%

Utilities

ZSP.TO
2.3%
IVLU
3.3%

Real Estate

ZSP.TO
1.9%
IVLU
1.5%

Basic Materials

ZSP.TO
1.8%
IVLU
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSP.TOIVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.10

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

11.82

-0.01

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSP.TO and IVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSP.TOIVLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.26

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.97

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.65

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.49

+0.65

Drawdowns

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP.TO and IVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSP.TOIVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.94%

-34.14%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-11.47%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-15.85%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-20.32%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.94%

-34.14%

+7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-1.68%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-6.56%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

3.00%

-0.71%

Volatility

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) is 3.87%, while iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that ZSP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSP.TOIVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.75%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

12.88%

-3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

15.75%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

17.59%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

18.66%

-2.28%

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSP.TO vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison

ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than IVLU's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
3.34%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.76%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.45%1.48%1.68%1.68%2.23%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSP.TO and IVLU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

ZSP.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP.TO and 0.30% for IVLU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSP.TO and IVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer