ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO
ZSP.TO (BMO S&P 500 Index ETF) and EQL.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD) are both S&P 500 funds - ZSP.TO tracks the S&P 500 Index while EQL.TO tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZSP.TO returned 16.74%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for EQL.TO. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZSP.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EQL.TO.
Performance
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSP.TO achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than EQL.TO's 10.79% return.
ZSP.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
EQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 16.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.15% | 12.02% | 35.07% | 23.30% | -12.68% | 27.53% | 15.61% | 24.69% | -1.65% |
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD | 10.79% | 5.94% | 27.38% | 19.69% | 1.21% | 37.03% | 21.67% | 31.63% | -4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSP.TO and EQL.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ZSP.TO and EQL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Financial Services
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Communication Services
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Healthcare
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Industrials
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Energy
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Utilities
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Real Estate
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Basic Materials
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSP.TO
EQL.TO
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSP.TO | EQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.06 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.70 | 10.94 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSP.TO | EQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.73 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.05 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSP.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.94%, smaller than the maximum EQL.TO drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP.TO and EQL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSP.TO | EQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -30.47% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -6.73% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -17.25% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -17.60% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.45% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -3.19% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.88% | +0.41% |
Volatility
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) is 3.14%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that ZSP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSP.TO | EQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.86% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 8.98% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 11.99% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.54% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.35% | -0.99% |
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSP.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZSP.TO vs. EQL.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than EQL.TO's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD | 1.26% | 1.38% | 5.37% | 8.14% | 8.91% | 7.19% | 9.96% | 8.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSP.TO BMO S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.82% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.44% | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSP.TO and EQL.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EQL.TO.
ZSP.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP.TO and 0.25% for EQL.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZSP.TO and EQL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer