PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSP-U.TO achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPXU's -22.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ZSP-U.TO has outperformed SPXU with an annualized return of 14.67%, while SPXU has yielded a comparatively lower -41.04% annualized return.


ZSP-U.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.54%
6M
7.86%
YTD
9.40%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
14.67%

SPXU

1D
3.19%
1M
-0.86%
6M
-19.71%
YTD
-22.60%
1Y
-38.23%
3Y*
-38.79%
5Y*
-33.32%
10Y*
-41.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
9.40%17.73%24.40%26.04%-18.51%28.46%18.41%30.99%-5.39%21.42%
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
-22.60%-41.73%-43.31%-46.02%36.05%-57.94%-70.39%-56.27%3.97%-44.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and SPXU is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

-0.83

The correlation between ZSP-U.TO and SPXU shifts across timeframes, from -0.94 (5 years) to -0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXU
SPXU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSP-U.TOSPXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.83

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

-0.88

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

-1.49

+10.91

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the SPXU Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSP-U.TO and SPXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSP-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSP-U.TO and SPXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSP-U.TOSPXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-99.99%

+66.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-43.83%

+34.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.70%

-84.36%

+65.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-90.23%

+65.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-99.56%

+65.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-99.99%

+98.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-93.36%

+89.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

25.71%

-23.64%

Volatility

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) is 3.01%, while ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that ZSP-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSP-U.TOSPXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

10.69%

-7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

30.14%

-19.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

37.66%

-25.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

50.67%

-33.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

53.34%

-35.85%

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSP-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSP-U.TO vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison

ZSP-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than SPXU's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
6.71%7.02%9.53%7.06%0.39%0.00%0.70%2.14%1.41%0.10%0.00%0.00%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.81%0.85%1.04%1.38%1.55%1.15%1.57%1.41%1.67%1.58%1.49%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSP-U.TO and SPXU have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.

ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO and 0.90% for SPXU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSP-U.TO and SPXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer