ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO
ZSML.TO (BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSML.TO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZSML.TO returned 8.17%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for VFV.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZSML.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSML.TO achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.
ZSML.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSML.TO BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF | 16.56% | 0.20% | 17.47% | 12.67% | -11.12% | 28.32% | 13.69% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.30% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 23.23% | -12.58% | 27.51% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSML.TO and VFV.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2020 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, ZSML.TO and VFV.TO have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Industrials
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Technology
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Healthcare
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Real Estate
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Energy
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Basic Materials
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Communication Services
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Utilities
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSML.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 3.44 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 13.10 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSML.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.59 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.14 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.14 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSML.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSML.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSML.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -27.43% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -8.62% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.87% | -19.05% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.87% | -22.19% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.18% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -3.35% | -5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.26% | +0.13% |
Volatility
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that ZSML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSML.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 3.05% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 8.55% | +3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 11.46% | +6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 14.91% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 16.57% | +5.90% |
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSML.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
ZSML.TO BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.47% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSML.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZSML.TO.
ZSML.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. ZSML.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600® Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZSML.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZSML.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer