PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSML.TO achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return.


ZSML.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.50%
YTD
16.56%
6M
13.03%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

VFV.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
7.30%
YTD
12.30%
6M
10.47%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZSML.TO
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF
16.56%0.20%17.47%12.67%-11.12%28.32%13.69%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
12.30%12.18%35.23%23.23%-12.58%27.51%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSML.TO and VFV.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2020

0.42

Over the past year, ZSML.TO and VFV.TO have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZSML.TO
VFV.TO

Financial Services

17.1%
11.6%

Industrials

15.5%
8.3%

Technology

15.1%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

11.2%
8.5%

Real Estate

7.7%
1.9%

Energy

5.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.9%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Financial Services

ZSML.TO
17.1%
VFV.TO
11.6%

Industrials

ZSML.TO
15.5%
VFV.TO
8.3%

Technology

ZSML.TO
15.1%
VFV.TO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ZSML.TO
13.4%
VFV.TO
10.2%

Healthcare

ZSML.TO
11.2%
VFV.TO
8.5%

Real Estate

ZSML.TO
7.7%
VFV.TO
1.9%

Energy

ZSML.TO
5.8%
VFV.TO
3.5%

Basic Materials

ZSML.TO
5.2%
VFV.TO
1.8%

Communication Services

ZSML.TO
3.6%
VFV.TO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

ZSML.TO
3.5%
VFV.TO
4.9%

Utilities

ZSML.TO
2.0%
VFV.TO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSML.TO
ZSML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ZSML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
VFV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSML.TOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.44

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

13.10

+0.35

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the VFV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSML.TO and VFV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSML.TOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.59

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.14

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.14

-0.62

Drawdowns

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSML.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSML.TO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSML.TOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-27.43%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-8.62%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.87%

-19.05%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.87%

-22.19%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.18%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-3.35%

-5.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.26%

+0.13%

Volatility

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that ZSML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSML.TOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

3.05%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

8.55%

+3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

11.46%

+6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

14.91%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.47%

16.57%

+5.90%

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSML.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZSML.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.83%0.92%0.99%1.20%1.31%1.06%1.33%1.55%1.68%1.50%1.66%1.63%
ZSML.TO
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF
1.03%1.21%1.22%1.47%1.72%1.02%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSML.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZSML.TO.

ZSML.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. ZSML.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600® Index, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZSML.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSML.TO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer