PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZSML.TO is traded in CAD, while AVUV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVUV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSML.TO achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.47% return.


ZSML.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.50%
YTD
16.56%
6M
13.03%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.23%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.78%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZSML.TO
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF
16.56%0.20%17.47%12.67%-11.12%28.32%13.69%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.47%2.51%18.67%20.11%1.87%40.91%7.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSML.TO and AVUV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2020

0.54

Over the past year, ZSML.TO and AVUV have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZSML.TO
AVUV

Financial Services

17.1%
25.8%

Industrials

15.5%
13.9%

Technology

15.1%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
18.0%

Healthcare

11.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.7%
0.7%

Energy

5.8%
18.2%

Basic Materials

5.2%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.5%

Utilities

2.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

ZSML.TO
17.1%
AVUV
25.8%

Industrials

ZSML.TO
15.5%
AVUV
13.9%

Technology

ZSML.TO
15.1%
AVUV
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ZSML.TO
13.4%
AVUV
18.0%

Healthcare

ZSML.TO
11.2%
AVUV
4.2%

Real Estate

ZSML.TO
7.7%
AVUV
0.7%

Energy

ZSML.TO
5.8%
AVUV
18.2%

Basic Materials

ZSML.TO
5.2%
AVUV
4.9%

Communication Services

ZSML.TO
3.6%
AVUV
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZSML.TO
3.5%
AVUV
4.5%

Utilities

ZSML.TO
2.0%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSML.TO
ZSML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ZSML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSML.TOAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

4.91

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.45

16.91

-3.46

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSML.TO and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSML.TOAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.22

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.68

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.65

-0.12

Drawdowns

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSML.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSML.TO and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSML.TOAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-44.29%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-7.82%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.87%

-27.37%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.87%

-27.37%

+0.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.57%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-6.88%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.27%

+0.12%

Volatility

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.09%. This indicates that ZSML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSML.TOAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

4.09%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

11.60%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

17.36%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

20.53%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.47%

25.67%

-3.20%

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSML.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

ZSML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than AVUV's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
ZSML.TO
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF
1.03%1.21%1.22%1.47%1.72%1.02%1.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSML.TO and AVUV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSML.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSML.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

ZSML.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZSML.TO and 0.25% for AVUV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSML.TO and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer