ZSML.TO vs. AVUV
ZSML.TO (BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZSML.TO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. ZSML.TO is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZSML.TO returned 8.17%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for AVUV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZSML.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZSML.TO is traded in CAD, while AVUV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVUV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSML.TO achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.47% return.
ZSML.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- —
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSML.TO BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF | 16.56% | 0.20% | 17.47% | 12.67% | -11.12% | 28.32% | 13.69% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 2.51% | 18.67% | 20.11% | 1.87% | 40.91% | 7.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSML.TO and AVUV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2020 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, ZSML.TO and AVUV have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Industrials
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Technology
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Healthcare
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Real Estate
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Energy
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Basic Materials
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Communication Services
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Utilities
ZSML.TO
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
ZSML.TO
AVUV
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSML.TO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 4.91 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 16.91 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSML.TO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.22 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSML.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSML.TO and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSML.TO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -44.29% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -7.82% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.87% | -27.37% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.87% | -27.37% | +0.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.57% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -6.88% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.27% | +0.12% |
Volatility
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.09%. This indicates that ZSML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSML.TO | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 4.09% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 11.60% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 17.36% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 20.53% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 25.67% | -3.20% |
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZSML.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZSML.TO vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
ZSML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% |
ZSML.TO BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.47% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSML.TO and AVUV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZSML.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZSML.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
ZSML.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZSML.TO and 0.25% for AVUV.
Find the right allocation for ZSML.TO and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer