PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSC vs. COM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZSC vs. COM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZSC vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
4.85%28.43%-14.39%-10.63%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
14.18%7.72%5.81%-4.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSC achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 14.18% return.


ZSC

1D
0.44%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.85%
6M
17.52%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COM

1D
0.21%
1M
5.67%
YTD
14.18%
6M
18.01%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZSC vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZSC vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSC
ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

COM
COM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
COM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
COM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
COM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
COM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSC vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSCCOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

1.72

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

2.24

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

2.96

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.11

6.37

+5.74

ZSC vs. COM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the COM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSC and COM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSCCOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.72

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.73

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between ZSC and COM is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ZSC vs. COM - Dividend Comparison

ZSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than COM's 2.48% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
1.67%1.75%2.18%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COM
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
2.48%2.99%3.88%3.80%8.59%10.32%0.13%1.09%2.36%0.09%

Drawdowns

ZSC vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSC drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSC and COM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSCCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

-15.95%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-6.15%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.64%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-6.38%

-9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.86%

-0.29%

Volatility

ZSC vs. COM - Volatility Comparison

USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 3.77%. This indicates that ZSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZSCCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.77%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

8.21%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

10.35%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

9.71%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

9.76%

+2.66%