PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly higher than ZAAA.NEO's 5.64% return.


ZQQ.TO

1D
-3.53%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
14.60%
6M
9.55%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
19.75%

ZAAA.NEO

1D
0.32%
1M
3.29%
YTD
5.64%
6M
6.09%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
14.60%20.52%
ZAAA.NEO
BMO AAA CLO ETF
5.64%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZAAA.NEO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAAA.NEO
ZAAA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ZAAA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZQQ.TOZAAA.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.89

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

7.00

-1.44

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the ZAAA.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZQQ.TO and ZAAA.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than ZAAA.NEO's maximum drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and ZAAA.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZQQ.TOZAAA.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.39%

-3.01%

-33.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-3.01%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

0.00%

-4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-1.03%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

1.24%

+3.67%

Volatility

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Volatility Comparison

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO) at 1.38%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAAA.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZQQ.TOZAAA.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

1.38%

+7.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.89%

3.38%

+11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.10%

4.71%

+13.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

4.68%

+18.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

4.68%

+17.87%

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAAA.NEO's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZQQ.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Dividend Comparison

ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than ZAAA.NEO's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZAAA.NEO
BMO AAA CLO ETF
5.09%3.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.23%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZQQ.TO and ZAAA.NEO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAAA.NEO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAAA.NEO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZAAA.NEO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.23% for ZAAA.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and ZAAA.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer