PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAAA.NEO achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than ZDV.TO's 18.56% return.


ZAAA.NEO

1D
0.50%
1M
2.59%
YTD
3.12%
6M
1.98%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZDV.TO

1D
-0.22%
1M
4.61%
YTD
18.56%
6M
13.14%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZAAA.NEO
BMO AAA CLO ETF
3.12%3.21%
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF
18.56%15.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ZAAA.NEO and ZDV.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAAA.NEO
ZAAA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ZAAA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDV.TO
ZDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAAA.NEOZDV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.66

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

4.69

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

18.24

-13.17

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAAA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAAA.NEO and ZDV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAAA.NEOZDV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.95

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.68

+0.61

Drawdowns

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAAA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -3.01%, smaller than the maximum ZDV.TO drawdown of -43.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAAA.NEO and ZDV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAAA.NEOZDV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-43.21%

+40.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-6.65%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-5.12%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.71%

-0.47%

Volatility

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO) is 0.92%, while BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) has a volatility of 2.49%. This indicates that ZAAA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAAA.NEOZDV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

2.49%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

9.69%

-6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

10.57%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.61%

10.94%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.61%

15.11%

-10.50%

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZAAA.NEO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than ZDV.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZAAA.NEO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZAAA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than ZDV.TO's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZAAA.NEO
BMO AAA CLO ETF
5.21%3.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF
2.68%3.07%3.57%4.10%4.10%3.63%4.48%4.11%5.06%3.96%3.84%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAAA.NEO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAAA.NEO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAAA.NEO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZDV.TO.

ZAAA.NEO is categorized as CLO, while ZDV.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for ZAAA.NEO and 0.39% for ZDV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAAA.NEO and ZDV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer