ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO
ZPW.TO (BMO US Put Write ETF) and JEPI.TO (JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZPW.TO returned 13.56% vs 12.03% for JEPI.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPW.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.TO.
Performance
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZPW.TO having a 6.43% return and JEPI.TO slightly lower at 6.15%.
ZPW.TO
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 13.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.21%
JEPI.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 12.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZPW.TO BMO US Put Write ETF | 6.43% | 6.40% | 5.11% |
JEPI.TO JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 6.15% | 3.09% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPW.TO and JEPI.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ZPW.TO and JEPI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZPW.TO
JEPI.TO
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZPW.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.27 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 5.69 | +1.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPW.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, which is greater than JEPI.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPW.TO and JEPI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPW.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.77% | -14.36% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.61% | -5.32% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.89% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -3.21% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.12% | -0.15% |
Volatility
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI.TO) at 2.11%. This indicates that ZPW.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPW.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.11% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.19% | 7.33% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.24% | 9.83% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 12.57% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 12.57% | -0.85% |
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPW.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPW.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZPW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than JEPI.TO's 7.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPI.TO JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 7.29% | 7.56% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPW.TO BMO US Put Write ETF | 9.43% | 9.55% | 9.18% | 7.57% | 8.20% | 7.24% | 7.61% | 7.17% | 6.61% | 6.82% | 7.32% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPW.TO and JEPI.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPI.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPI.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPW.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZPW.TO and 0.35% for JEPI.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZPW.TO and JEPI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer