ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L
ZPRX.DE (SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPRX.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZPRX.DE returned 8.89%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for CNX1.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPRX.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.
Performance
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPRX.DE is traded in EUR, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRX.DE achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 18.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRX.DE has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 8.89%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.18% annualized return.
ZPRX.DE
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
CNX1.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 36.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.18%
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRX.DE SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 8.10% | 26.81% | 4.29% | 15.26% | -13.51% | 27.59% | -3.52% | 28.99% | -19.19% | 12.89% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.40% | 5.75% | 34.71% | 50.84% | -29.37% | 37.92% | 35.46% | 42.13% | 3.33% | 15.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRX.DE and CNX1.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015 | 0.49 |
The correlation between ZPRX.DE and CNX1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRX.DE
CNX1.L
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZPRX.DE | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.48 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 10.24 | -4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRX.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRX.DE and CNX1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRX.DE | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.93% | -31.25% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -10.18% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -26.50% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.52% | -31.25% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | -31.25% | -12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -2.78% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -5.58% | -2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.47% | -0.30% |
Volatility
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE) is 4.25%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that ZPRX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRX.DE | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.34% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 11.49% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 15.91% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 30.93% | -14.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 25.92% | -7.82% |
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRX.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPRX.DE vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPRX.DE nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRX.DE and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPRX.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPRX.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.
ZPRX.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. ZPRX.DE tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZPRX.DE and 0.36% for CNX1.L.
Find the right allocation for ZPRX.DE and CNX1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer