PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRV.DE achieves a 18.05% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV.AS's 11.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZPRV.DE having a 12.19% annualized return and TDIV.AS not far ahead at 12.48%.


ZPRV.DE

1D
2.02%
1M
7.15%
YTD
18.05%
6M
16.39%
1Y
38.06%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
12.19%

TDIV.AS

1D
0.36%
1M
1.94%
YTD
11.72%
6M
13.92%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
17.83%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
18.05%2.99%14.07%19.11%-5.40%48.22%-1.86%27.40%-11.77%-3.75%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
11.72%24.39%15.90%11.75%15.40%27.83%-10.16%20.97%-7.12%2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRV.DE and TDIV.AS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between ZPRV.DE and TDIV.AS has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRV.DE
ZPRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPRV.DETDIV.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.40

7.82

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.02

22.20

-2.18

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRV.DE and TDIV.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than TDIV.AS's maximum drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRV.DE and TDIV.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRV.DETDIV.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-36.10%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-3.51%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.14%

-15.88%

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.14%

-15.88%

-15.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

-36.10%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.36%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-3.97%

-5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.22%

+0.66%

Volatility

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) at 2.29%. This indicates that ZPRV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRV.DETDIV.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.29%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

6.74%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

9.12%

+6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

13.12%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

14.70%

+8.17%

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRV.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV.AS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRV.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Dividend Comparison

ZPRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.14%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.58%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRV.DE and TDIV.AS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

ZPRV.DE is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while TDIV.AS is Global Equity Income. ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZPRV.DE and 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRV.DE and TDIV.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer